<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Daily News Roundup?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://contemporaryracism.org/2719/daily-news-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://contemporaryracism.org/2719/daily-news-roundup/</link>
	<description>An academic blog about whiteness, implicit bias, and systemic racism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 18:26:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: EmilyBlakeslee		</title>
		<link>https://contemporaryracism.org/2719/daily-news-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-339</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EmilyBlakeslee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contemporaryracism.org/?p=2719#comment-339</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://contemporaryracism.org/2719/daily-news-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-328&quot;&gt;jena.verlin&lt;/a&gt;.

Jena I think your points are really interesting! How much of these stories are just sensationalized, and are their  root concerns ever really addressed? Or is it just entertainment fodder? 

Bri, I&#039;m glad that those up-skirt photos were ruled illegal. I guess the issue got enough media attention that the legislature dealt with it quickly to avoid bad press. It is very disturbing that this was an issue in the first place! I hope that the laws protect people of all genders and clothing styles. While this is probably an issue for mostly women, I&#039;m worried that, the way the law was written, it might not protect everyone.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://contemporaryracism.org/2719/daily-news-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-328">jena.verlin</a>.</p>
<p>Jena I think your points are really interesting! How much of these stories are just sensationalized, and are their  root concerns ever really addressed? Or is it just entertainment fodder? </p>
<p>Bri, I&#8217;m glad that those up-skirt photos were ruled illegal. I guess the issue got enough media attention that the legislature dealt with it quickly to avoid bad press. It is very disturbing that this was an issue in the first place! I hope that the laws protect people of all genders and clothing styles. While this is probably an issue for mostly women, I&#8217;m worried that, the way the law was written, it might not protect everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: brianna		</title>
		<link>https://contemporaryracism.org/2719/daily-news-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-332</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brianna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 19:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contemporaryracism.org/?p=2719#comment-332</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I saw a few of these stories being covered over break as well. They become much more interesting when we look beyond what is being said or covered and think about what it really means. I&#039;ve never seen the Cadillac commercial, but I am so glad you shared it. I think it really relates to the concepts we&#039;ve discussed in class such as meritocracy and how it relates to racism. And fortunately, I read that just a few days after up-the-skirt photos were declared legal in Massachusetts, they were ruled illegal. But the mere fact that there had to be a debate and an outrage to assure a basic privacy for women is disturbing to me. How is it possible that this was ever an issue?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw a few of these stories being covered over break as well. They become much more interesting when we look beyond what is being said or covered and think about what it really means. I&#8217;ve never seen the Cadillac commercial, but I am so glad you shared it. I think it really relates to the concepts we&#8217;ve discussed in class such as meritocracy and how it relates to racism. And fortunately, I read that just a few days after up-the-skirt photos were declared legal in Massachusetts, they were ruled illegal. But the mere fact that there had to be a debate and an outrage to assure a basic privacy for women is disturbing to me. How is it possible that this was ever an issue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jena.verlin		</title>
		<link>https://contemporaryracism.org/2719/daily-news-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-328</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jena.verlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 16:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contemporaryracism.org/?p=2719#comment-328</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It is interesting that I have heard about many of these events but never really stopped to think about what the sheer volume of them means. The fact that stories like these have turned into cultural phenomenon bring up a lot of questions for me about the news and media in general. How and why have we fallen into this trap of sensationalistic news that is focused around marginalized or oppressed communities? What does it mean that as a culture we find this entertaining?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting that I have heard about many of these events but never really stopped to think about what the sheer volume of them means. The fact that stories like these have turned into cultural phenomenon bring up a lot of questions for me about the news and media in general. How and why have we fallen into this trap of sensationalistic news that is focused around marginalized or oppressed communities? What does it mean that as a culture we find this entertaining?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
