<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: We&#8217;re One in the Same?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://contemporaryracism.org/3226/were-one-in-the-same/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://contemporaryracism.org/3226/were-one-in-the-same/</link>
	<description>An academic blog about whiteness, implicit bias, and systemic racism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 17:42:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Sofia Montgomery		</title>
		<link>https://contemporaryracism.org/3226/were-one-in-the-same/comment-page-1/#comment-767</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sofia Montgomery]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 17:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contemporaryracism.org/?p=3226#comment-767</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[McKayle&#039;s comments are troubling, because it creates this idea of sameness, which you talk about. When discussing race, it is not as easy to walk in somebody else&#039;s shoes, because a white man can never know what it&#039;s like to be a black woman and so on. McKayle definitely seems &quot;well-intentioned&quot;, but of course this is problematic because of the idea of color-evasion, and ignoring race in the hopes of reducing prejudice. I wonder how POCs felt when (or if) they watched this piece. I also find that this tends to happen in the media where it becomes &quot;white-washed&quot;, because white actors have greater accessibility for these parts, even though when you think about it, it doesn&#039;t make sense. I definitely agree with you that your white classmates took the &quot;easy&quot; way out, because it definitely invalidates and discredits past history of marginalized groups&#039; oppression. I also question race&#039;s place in art, because so many people enjoy different types of art that come from many diverse origins; I definitely think that in this piece, there should&#039;ve been more diversity and especially, in leading roles. 
It&#039;s so important to remember that we are all important, but we are not all the same.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McKayle&#8217;s comments are troubling, because it creates this idea of sameness, which you talk about. When discussing race, it is not as easy to walk in somebody else&#8217;s shoes, because a white man can never know what it&#8217;s like to be a black woman and so on. McKayle definitely seems &#8220;well-intentioned&#8221;, but of course this is problematic because of the idea of color-evasion, and ignoring race in the hopes of reducing prejudice. I wonder how POCs felt when (or if) they watched this piece. I also find that this tends to happen in the media where it becomes &#8220;white-washed&#8221;, because white actors have greater accessibility for these parts, even though when you think about it, it doesn&#8217;t make sense. I definitely agree with you that your white classmates took the &#8220;easy&#8221; way out, because it definitely invalidates and discredits past history of marginalized groups&#8217; oppression. I also question race&#8217;s place in art, because so many people enjoy different types of art that come from many diverse origins; I definitely think that in this piece, there should&#8217;ve been more diversity and especially, in leading roles.<br />
It&#8217;s so important to remember that we are all important, but we are not all the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
