<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;Ethnic&#8221; as &#8220;Other&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://contemporaryracism.org/3516/ethnic-as-other/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://contemporaryracism.org/3516/ethnic-as-other/</link>
	<description>An academic blog about whiteness, implicit bias, and systemic racism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2018 18:07:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Caroline Whiting		</title>
		<link>https://contemporaryracism.org/3516/ethnic-as-other/comment-page-1/#comment-914</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caroline Whiting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2018 18:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contemporaryracism.org/?p=3516#comment-914</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is a great post, Julia. I think your insights are so interesting, and I have recognized this same issue in beauty sections of stores. It is a subtle, less noticeable means of oppression that would not be recognized in the slightest by the untrained eye. This makes it an issue of &quot;Us vs. Them&quot;, as you&#039;ve mentioned with your idea of the &quot;other&quot;. In my mind, these two ideas go hand in hand. By making industries such as that of beauty products so racialized, we are &quot;othering&quot; people who do not fall into our ideals of beauty, which equates to Whiteness in our society. By doing this, we are making it not only a racialized issue, but separating ourselves from the issue completely, making it a &quot;them&quot; issue. It is almost as though the beauty industry does not see the problem; by making these distinctions, they are essentially saying that one body is more beautiful than another, and this is an extremely unsettling way of regarding our standards of beauty.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great post, Julia. I think your insights are so interesting, and I have recognized this same issue in beauty sections of stores. It is a subtle, less noticeable means of oppression that would not be recognized in the slightest by the untrained eye. This makes it an issue of &#8220;Us vs. Them&#8221;, as you&#8217;ve mentioned with your idea of the &#8220;other&#8221;. In my mind, these two ideas go hand in hand. By making industries such as that of beauty products so racialized, we are &#8220;othering&#8221; people who do not fall into our ideals of beauty, which equates to Whiteness in our society. By doing this, we are making it not only a racialized issue, but separating ourselves from the issue completely, making it a &#8220;them&#8221; issue. It is almost as though the beauty industry does not see the problem; by making these distinctions, they are essentially saying that one body is more beautiful than another, and this is an extremely unsettling way of regarding our standards of beauty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lily Josephs		</title>
		<link>https://contemporaryracism.org/3516/ethnic-as-other/comment-page-1/#comment-906</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lily Josephs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 16:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contemporaryracism.org/?p=3516#comment-906</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I really enjoyed reading this blog post because it reminded me of an article I saw in January that I found very disturbing. The headline from the Business Insider article stated, &quot;Furious Walmart Customers Post Videos of Stores Locking Up African-American Beauty Products&quot;. And, to go even further, the customer filed a lawsuit against Walmart for alleging racial discrimination. Being a frequent shopper at CVS, I know that the more expensive products (razors, some medications, high-end beauty products) are locked up for fear of theft. However, I have never seen &quot;ethnic,&quot; African American, or Black hair products behind the glass. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s enough for the customer in this case to just not shop at Walmart. This is a part of the system and must be changed with laws and regulations. Hair should not be represented as different- and more specifically, Black or African American hair should not be viewed as different or &quot;ethnic&quot;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed reading this blog post because it reminded me of an article I saw in January that I found very disturbing. The headline from the Business Insider article stated, &#8220;Furious Walmart Customers Post Videos of Stores Locking Up African-American Beauty Products&#8221;. And, to go even further, the customer filed a lawsuit against Walmart for alleging racial discrimination. Being a frequent shopper at CVS, I know that the more expensive products (razors, some medications, high-end beauty products) are locked up for fear of theft. However, I have never seen &#8220;ethnic,&#8221; African American, or Black hair products behind the glass. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s enough for the customer in this case to just not shop at Walmart. This is a part of the system and must be changed with laws and regulations. Hair should not be represented as different- and more specifically, Black or African American hair should not be viewed as different or &#8220;ethnic&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
